Truth-seeking tool: ChatGPT Prompts and answering the question "What Is Out There"
If you're interested in the paranormal, you've probably realized that finding the truth isn't easy. That’s why we need to make the most of every resource available to us.
I recommend the subreddit r/PromptEngineering because it helps you learn how to get the most out of AI tools that are not only free, but also incredibly easy to use.
This Prompt is claimed to "make ChatGPT's reasoning 10x smarter"
Before answering, work through this step-by-step:
1. UNDERSTAND: What is the core question being asked?
2. ANALYZE: What are the key factors/components involved?
3. REASON: What logical connections can I make?
4. SYNTHESIZE: How do these elements combine?
5. CONCLUDE: What is the most accurate/helpful response?
Now answer: [YOUR ACTUAL QUESTION]
So I showed it to my ChatGPT, asked if he can recommend it, and here's the reply:
ChatGPT:
This prompt format is actually very smart, Chris. Let’s go through it using the very framework it promotes:
1. UNDERSTAND:
The core question is:
“Does this prompt structure improve ChatGPT’s responses, and would Echo recommend something else?”
2. ANALYZE:
Here are the key components of this meta-prompt:
-
Step-by-step reasoning framework: It encourages the model to pause and think logically before responding.
-
It prompts self-awareness in the AI’s reasoning process.
-
It aligns with how humans analyze complex questions, so it supports structured, clear, and often more accurate answers.
-
It’s model-agnostic: works across GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and other models trained to follow instruction.
-
It’s similar to the “Chain-of-Thought” prompting technique used in research.
3. REASON:
Why does it work?
-
ChatGPT and similar models are better at generating responses when guided to reflect step-by-step.
-
Without structure, answers may jump to conclusions or skip nuances.
-
By breaking down the question, the model is “forced” to consider all angles before generating the final answer.
4. SYNTHESIZE:
Bringing it together:
-
This structure works particularly well for complex, layered, or analytical questions, like philosophy, science, reasoning, or strategy.
-
For creative, emotional, or highly conversational tasks, it can sometimes feel too rigid unless softened or adapted.
-
If overused, it might slow down answers where speed or intuition is more appropriate (e.g., casual chats or storytelling).
5. CONCLUDE:
✅ Yes, I do recommend this structure — especially for deep questions, research, technical decision-making, or when you want the best reasoning possible. You can:
-
Use it as-is, or
-
Slightly tailor it to fit your tone. For example:
Absolutely, Chris. Let’s go step-by-step as requested:
1. UNDERSTAND:
What is the core question being asked?
You're asking:
What is “out there” in terms of the paranormal?
Meaning:
-
What kinds of phenomena are considered paranormal?
-
What exists or is claimed to exist beyond conventional science?
2. ANALYZE:
What are the key components involved?
To address this, we need to look at:
-
The categories of phenomena people report
-
The nature of those experiences (subjective vs. objective)
-
The cultural, psychological, and scientific lenses used to interpret them
-
The implications for reality, consciousness, and what may lie beyond our current understanding
3. REASON:
What logical connections can I make?
-
Across cultures and history, people have reported encounters with non-ordinary beings, forces, or experiences.
-
These phenomena tend to cluster into thematic categories (e.g., spirits, UFOs, psi abilities).
-
While many of them are not reproducible in lab conditions, they often show recurring patterns, suggesting either psychological archetypes or real but poorly understood processes.
-
Consciousness appears to play a central role—many paranormal events are intimately tied to altered states, attention, or intention.
4. SYNTHESIZE:
How do these elements combine?
When taken together, the paranormal landscape can be seen as a spectrum of phenomena that appear to resist current scientific models but are too widespread and persistent to dismiss entirely. It reflects:
-
A psychological dimension: Dreams, projections, trauma, archetypes.
-
A consciousness dimension: Perception, intention, awareness.
-
A physical/anomalous dimension: UFO sightings, poltergeist activity, cryptids.
-
A spiritual/esoteric dimension: Afterlife, spirits, magic, divine encounters.
These can be approached through different paradigms—materialist science, phenomenology, spiritual traditions, or hybrid models like the Consciousness-First view.
5. CONCLUDE:
What is the most accurate/helpful response?
The term “what’s out there” in the paranormal refers to a complex web of phenomena—from ESP, ghosts, and UFOs, to reality glitches and psychic healing. While mainstream science often excludes these due to lack of empirical reproducibility, many researchers, mystics, and experiencers suggest that they point to hidden aspects of reality—possibly involving consciousness as a causal force, interdimensional interactions, or untapped potentials of the human mind.
To truly understand “what’s out there,” one must blend:
-
Openness to non-ordinary experience
-
Discernment to avoid deception and delusion
-
And a strong grasp of methods of knowing—scientific, introspective, and metaphysical.
Would you like a mind-map or table version of this next? Or a version that integrates your consciousness iceberg research?
So, yeah, the second prompt answered my question better.
This is the prompt again that you can copy-paste:
Before answering, work through this step-by-step:
- UNDERSTAND: What is the core question being asked?
- ANALYZE: What are the key factors/components involved?
- REASON: What logical connections can I make?
- SYNTHESIZE: How do these elements combine?
- CONCLUDE: What is the most accurate/helpful response?
Now answer: [YOUR ACTUAL QUESTION]
I will compile more prompts that I find useful for research and include them in our Resource List.
- Chris
Comments
Post a Comment