Paranormal Theories List
UFOs
2. from Ret. Col. Karl Nell 's presentation at the Sol Foundation at Stanford last November 2023 https://twitter.com/matthew_pines/status/1757223639160680789
More info:
UAP Origin Classification System (OCS)
A comprehensive taxonomy of theories exploring the nature and origins of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
https://www.uapcaucus.com/ocs
Consciousness
This part didn't fit the screenshot above but here it is:
These are discussed in this video by Essentia Foundation (2 hours, 55 minutes long).
If you want to read the paper, it's here. "A Landscape of Consciousness: Toward a Taxonomy of Explanations and Implications"
Paranormal Theories
So far, I haven’t come across a comprehensive list of paranormal theories. That’s why I’ve decided to collect and share them here in this blog.
What follows is a starting point: a summary of theories discussed in the book Ghosted! Exploring the Haunting Reality of Paranormal Encounters. I’ll be adding more as I continue my research.
Theory | Core Idea | Support / Arguments | Criticisms / Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Discarnate Agency (Survival / Spirit Hypothesis) | Ghosts are spirits of the deceased or spiritistic entities; motives include comfort, revenge, unfinished business, attachment, or out-of-body appearances. | Traditional spiritualist view; appeals to conservation-of-energy & speculative quantum entanglement ideas; historical reports of intelligent actions (e.g., SPR, Roll); high prevalence of haunting reports vs. low rate of hallucination disorders. | Conservation-of-energy often misunderstood; mediumship fraud; lack of direct scientific proof; some cases explained by contagion or hallucination. |
Psi-Based Theory (Human Agency) | Paranormal events arise from psychic abilities of the living (telepathy, PK, ESP); apparitions are telepathic or internal projections. | Laboratory ESP/PK studies (RNGs, dice, telepathy); historical documentation (Gurney, Myers); explains poltergeists as unconscious PK from focus persons. | Experimental results are weak and debated; critics claim flawed methods and selective analysis; does not neatly explain all objective/physical phenomena. |
Hybrid / Subjectivist–Objectivist (Stone Tape / Place Memory) | Traumatic events leave psychic or physical traces in locations that can later be replayed — a "recording" of past events experienced by sensitive witnesses. | Popularized in culture (1971 BBC play); rooted in older ideas (Babbage, H.H. Price, SPR); fits reports where place + sensitive person interact. | Physics offers no mechanism for persistent recordings; considered pseudo-logical by many; no empirical mechanism demonstrated. |
Simulation Hypothesis | Reality is a simulation or hologram; haunt anomalies are glitches or encoded inputs from underlying hardware/software. | Philosophically and mathematically tenable for some thinkers; discussed in high-profile forums and debates; resembles a technological reinterpretation of trace theories. | In principle unfalsifiable (evidence could itself be simulated); largely philosophical rather than empirically testable. |
Neurological / Transliminality ("Your Brain on Ghosts") | Ghostly experiences reflect brain function—especially in high-transliminals or those with temporal-lobe lability—producing dissociative, hallucinatory, or altered states. | High-transliminals show greater belief, mystical experiences, sensory sensitivity; correlations with psi-test outcomes; temporal lobe linked to sensed presences, déjà vu, religiosity; measurable neurocognitive changes during encounters. | Skeptics view them as cognitive errors or epilepsy-like activity; does not directly account for external physical effects; causation (brain→experience or experience→brain) remains debated. |
These are my notes from the book The Brave Mortal's Guide to Ghost Hunting by Alex Matsuo
Theory | Core Idea | Support / Arguments | Criticisms / Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Parallel / Alternate Universes / Multiverse | Apparent hauntings are interactions with beings (or alternate versions of people) from other universes or timelines, not the deceased from our timeline. | Explains anachronistic phenomena; allows for non-linear time interactions; aligns with speculative physics ideas about multiverses. | Largely theoretical with little direct empirical evidence in paranormal studies; hard to test; may conflate metaphysics with folklore. |
Non-Linear Time / Temporal Overlap | “Ghosts” are people from different points in time whose timelines overlap with ours, so communication may be with individuals from a different era. | Accounts for historical voices/visuals appearing in present-day locations; fits some eyewitness reports tied to specific past events. | If common, should produce clearer historical corroboration; often lacks reliable documentation linking event + communicator across time. |
It’s All in Our Head (Psychological / Sociocultural) | Hauntings arise from psychology: hallucination, suggestion, collective belief, memory errors, or the energy we give a story. | Explains variability in reports, placebo/nocebo effects; demonstrates how focused attention and rumor create events; supported by known cognitive biases. | Doesn’t account for multi-witness, multi-modal evidence easily (audio, physical traces) unless those are explainable by natural causes; can feel dismissive of experiencers. |
Everything Is a Demon (Demonology / Religious Interpretation) | Apparitions are not spirits of the dead but demons or malevolent entities masquerading as the deceased (grounded in some Christian traditions). | Matches religious texts and some historical frameworks; fits reports of distinctly malevolent, oppressive phenomena and possession cases. | Strongly culturally specific; risks conflating medical/psychological illness with spiritual demonology; sensationalism and dangerous outcomes (e.g., misuse of exorcism). |
Haunting in Layers (Multiple Planes / Stratified Energies) | Locations contain layered impressions/energies from many eras—ghosts of different centuries can coexist and not perceive one another. | Accounts for mixed-era phenomena (e.g., modern-dressed figure at historic sites); aligns with site-specific imprint ideas and stratified archaeological metaphors. | Mechanism unclear (how/why energy layers imprint or interact); difficult to falsify; can be influenced by suggestion and tourism framing. |
Imprinted / Haunted Objects | Objects retain energy or emotional imprint from people who treasured them, which can manifest as activity tied to the object. | Explains repeatable phenomena localized to items; consistent with many heirloom/possession reports and layered ownership histories. | Hard to test objectively; confounded by owner expectation, storytelling, and provenance marketing (tourism). |
Ghost Communication & Technology (Future Tech-savvy Spirits) | Tech-literate generations may carry their tech-knowledge into the afterlife, enabling clearer communication via modern devices; investigators may interact more easily with tech-savvy spirits. | Case anecdotes where investigator-style spirits “understand” equipment; plausible as culture/technology shapes consciousness and communication methods. | Anecdotal and speculative; assumes continuity of tech-knowledge after death; may privilege investigators’ interpretive frameworks. |
Spirit Agency / “Leave Me Alone” & Location Exhaustion | Spirits have moods, preferences, and limits; they aren’t obliged to speak and can become “exhausted” by constant attention—activity can vary night-to-night. | Explains intermittent activity and sudden changes (calm → aggressive); matches many investigators’ experiences and accounts of entities refusing contact. | Subjective interpretation of audio/EVP; may be anthropomorphizing unknown phenomena; difficult to differentiate from environmental or human-caused variability. |
Animal Spirits (Non-Human Entities) | Animals can persist as spirits and behave in character (e.g., ghost cats), sometimes interacting with groups or appearing intermittently. | Numerous consistent eyewitness anecdotes; animal behavior often described as non-threatening and character-consistent (e.g., cat sunbathing). | Anecdotal; could be misperception, expectation, or social sharing; lacks systematic empirical study. |
What Investigators Can Do With These Theories
Once you’re aware of the theories (or hypotheses), the next step is knowing how to use them as a framework for your observations. The following notes/implications can help.
Theory | Investigator notes / implications |
---|---|
Discarnate Agency (Survival / Spirit Hypothesis) | Treat cases with empathy and open-ended questioning; consider corroborating historical records. Beware of confirmation bias and emotional projection. Useful in client-centered work where comfort is important. |
Psi-Based Theory (Human Agency) | Look for correlations between focus persons and activity spikes. Psychological stress, adolescence, or trauma may amplify effects. Good reason to document emotional states and group dynamics during investigations. |
Hybrid / Subjectivist–Objectivist (Stone Tape / Place Memory) | Pay attention to environmental factors (stone, water, architecture). Use repeated visits to test whether the “recording” plays back consistently. Helps explain non-interactive apparitions. |
Simulation Hypothesis | Rarely practical in fieldwork, but prompts creative thinking. Log anomalies as “glitch-like” events—time loops, repeating phrases, distortions of space. Useful as a framing tool when conventional models fail. |
Neurological / Transliminality ("Your Brain on Ghosts") | Monitor investigator/experiencer physiology (stress, fatigue, EMF exposure). Keep balanced notes on personal sensations vs. environmental evidence. Helps separate subjective impressions from objective data. |
Parallel / Alternate Universes / Multiverse | Keep theory at high-level. Consider questions of identity (alternate self vs. stranger) and time. |
It’s all in our head | Strongly consider psychological, social, and cultural factors. Investigators should rule out hallucination, suggestion, group dynamics. |
Everything is a Demon | Investigate demonology skeptically; extreme demon-focused beliefs can be dangerous. Debunk physical explanations first; rare but possible negative activity has distinct physical/emotional sensations (heaviness, nausea, fight/flight). |
Haunting in Layers (multiple planes / time-layers) | Be open to multiple time-layers. Research long land history (pre-settlement) and recent events. Don’t limit queries to a single timeframe. |
Digging Deeper (ghosts unaware of each other / planes overlap) | During investigation, don’t assume all activity belongs to the same entity. Use broad, open communication techniques and multiple hypothesis testing. |
Ghost communication will improve over time | Consider tech-context of the deceased (generation, skills). Learn modern tech to interpret possible tech-mediated phenomena. |
Objects & energy imprinting | Treat artifacts as potential evidence; trace an object’s ownership and emotional history. |
“Leave me alone” (entities not always willing to talk) | Respect entity boundaries; recognize variability night-to-night. Avoid presuming entitlement to contact. Consider that tourism can stress a site. |
Animal Spirits | Non-human presences can be benign and behave like themselves. Don’t ignore fauna-type phenomena; they can be informative and easing for investigators. |
Why This is Important
More Info: Theories of Psi (Psychic Abilities)
- C.E.
Comments
Post a Comment